@gGenerally, if peop@@HarveyMaido@@ 2025N73ϊ(Ψ) 17F54 @@
@ | |
[C³] |
gGenerally, if people were more informed about the average
<a href=https://tripscan.biz>tripscan</a>
(environmental) cost of generating a response, people would maybe start thinking, eIs it really necessary to turn myself into an action figure just because Ifm bored?f Or edo I have to tell ChatGPT jokes because I have nothing to do?fh Dauner said.
Additionally, as more companies push to add generative AI tools to their systems, people may not have much choice how or when they use the technology, Luccioni said.
gWe donft need generative AI in web search. Nobody asked for AI chatbots in (messaging apps) or on social media,h Luccioni said. gThis race to stuff them into every single existing technology is truly infuriating, since it comes with real consequences to our planet.h
https://tripscan.biz
y{p~
With less available information about AIfs resource usage, consumers have less choice, Ren said, adding that regulatory pressures for more transparency are unlikely to the United States anytime soon. Instead, the best hope for more energy-efficient AI may lie in the cost efficacy of using less energy.
gOverall, Ifm still positive about (the future). There are many software engineers working hard to improve resource efficiency,h Ren said. gOther industries consume a lot of energy too, but itfs not a reason to suggest AIfs environmental impact is not a problem. We should definitely pay attention.h
Sign up for CNNfs Life, But Greener newsletter. Our limited newsletter series guides you on how to minimize your personal role in the climate crisis and reduce your eco-anxiety. |
|
|
